BG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 0.54%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s return on equity of 5.24%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $108.44, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has an analysts' consensus of $56.90 which suggests that it could fall by -2.3%. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co..

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.452%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. offers a yield of 3.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. pays out 54.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is higher than Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s net income of $110M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.83x while Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.'s PE ratio is 23.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.23x versus 0.34x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of -821.05%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.77%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $108.44, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, Inc., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than RegalWorks Media, Inc..

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media, Inc. has a beta of -1.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.067%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. RegalWorks Media, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9K. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is higher than RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s net income of -$15.6K. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.83x while RegalWorks Media, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.23x versus 225.02x for RegalWorks Media, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of 7.27%. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.08%.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $108.44, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $77.71 which suggests that it could grow by 30.09%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bunge Global SA, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Bunge Global SA.

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.382%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. pays out 48.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $733.5M. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $53.3M. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.83x while Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.23x versus 0.55x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMeWorld Ltd. has a net margin of 0.83% compared to Bunge Global SA's net margin of --. Bunge Global SA's return on equity of 11.03% beat UMeWorld Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

Bunge Global SA has a consensus price target of $108.44, signalling upside risk potential of 18.56%. On the other hand UMeWorld Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bunge Global SA has higher upside potential than UMeWorld Ltd., analysts believe Bunge Global SA is more attractive than UMeWorld Ltd..

Bunge Global SA has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.396% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMeWorld Ltd. has a beta of -1.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 290.615%.

Bunge Global SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. UMeWorld Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bunge Global SA pays 34.02% of its earnings as a dividend. UMeWorld Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bunge Global SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Bunge Global SA quarterly revenues are $22.2B, which are larger than UMeWorld Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bunge Global SA's net income of $184M is higher than UMeWorld Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bunge Global SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.83x while UMeWorld Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bunge Global SA is 0.23x versus 4,072.92x for UMeWorld Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.